If yours is a enterprise entity based mostly exterior Florida and you end up going through litigation within the Sunshine State, it is very important have a talented Florida industrial litigation legal professional in your aspect. Whether or not you’re searching for to get the cased dismissed resulting from an absence of jurisdiction or whether or not you’re litigating right here, you want skilled authorized counsel who is aware of how you can obtain the success you want.
In relation to a enterprise entity’s assertions of an absence of non-public jurisdiction, the usual in Florida has advanced in recent times. A recent case from Palm Seaside County highlights that change and what it means for out-of-state companies or these searching for to sue out-of-state companies in Florida.
The underlying case was a tortious interference motion that associated to a contract for the financing of a dolphin park. The funding financial institution that closed the deal for financing, and that was accused of participating within the tortious conduct, maintained a small presence in an workplace tower in Palm Seaside Gardens, however the financial institution maintained its major headquarters in Southern California.
All of this geography mattered when the plaintiff sued, because the case was filed in Florida. The financial institution was a Delaware entity and had its principal office in California, so it requested the decide to dismiss the case, arguing that Florida courts didn’t have private jurisdiction over it.
The trial decide rejected the request, pointing to the Palm Seaside Gardens workplace. The upkeep of that workplace confirmed that the financial institution maintained “systematic, common contact” with Florida, which in flip meant that Florida courts had jurisdiction over it, in response to the court docket.
The Supreme Court docket has elevated due course of protections for out-of-state entities
The financial institution appealed and, based mostly on its success in that case, acquired one other crack at arguing its lack-of-jurisdiction assertion. The appeals court docket, in ruling for the financial institution, acknowledged that the trial decide used the flawed authorized customary to resolve whether or not or not private jurisdiction existed. Whereas the authorized customary was simply “steady and systematic normal enterprise contacts,” current rulings from the U.S. Supreme Court docket have expanded the constitutional due course of rights of out-of-state enterprise entities.
Underneath the brand new customary, an out-of-state entity can win a lack-of-personal-jurisdiction argument so long as it could actually present that its contacts with the state the place the case was filed weren’t “so steady and systematic as to render [it] primarily at dwelling” in that state.
The financial institution had a Florida workplace and served Florida prospects in Florida. Nonetheless, that proof could or could not have been sufficient to point out that the financial institution was “at dwelling” in Florida. Figuring out that required one other listening to.
Whether or not yours is a breach of contract, breach of fiduciary obligation or tortious interference case, and whether or not you’re within the pretrial section, trial section or post-trial course of, you want the best attorneys working for you. The educated South Florida commercial litigation attorneys at Stok Kon + Braverman have an extended monitor document of serving to our enterprise shoppers to make use of the authorized system to guard their pursuits and obtain constructive outcomes.
Contact us on-line or by calling (954) 237-1777 to schedule your session and learn the way this agency may also help you.